Truth Details

AZ Maricopa – August, September 2021 - The original audit plan was to be fully transparent. - A judge ruled that the “Secret Ballots” could not be recorded. - Widespread misuse of “Secret Ballot” argument. - Somehow none of the interim results were broadcast either. - In the end, there was no transparency and no confidence in the final count. - Almost all of the ballot box seals had already been removed before taking custody. - One pallet at the beginning was an exception.

MI Antrim - Key Findings Continued; EMS software threw away the vote choice; Election night undervote of about 3000 votes; Machines can be subverted to swap votes; One person with access to 3rd party Designer software could subvert the election across the country remotely.

AZ Maricopa – Key Findings: - The EMS systems had been corrupted before the audit. - The County had preemptively brought in two EAC certified companies, Pro V&V and SLI Compliance. - Neither company mentioned corrupted files found on the system. Why? Did they corrupt them? - Conflict of interest: The companies certifying the system are auditing their own approvals. - Missing approximately 21,000 ballot images. - 263,000 ballot images corrupted for high-speed scanners after October 31. - Approximately 150,000 ballots read into the adjudicatable ballot database on the EMS and then removed.

MI Antrim – Key Findings: 1. Technician password was 123456 (potentially for the whole state). 2. Extra functions: reopen and rezero polls, access all menus. 3. Flaw allowing reopening of polls, adding ballots, changing time, and printing to simulate election night. 4. Microsoft SQL Server Management Suite 17 without a password allows bypassing system security. 5. Not on the certified list and not required to run the EMS. 6. Similar to Halderman, observed a shifted index but concluded differently as to the root cause. 7. Designer software option for seamless late changes not utilized. 8. Election file set must match database programming on EMS, requiring versioning that was absent. 9. Third-party programmer should have informed Antrim County about the need to reprogram if reindexed. 10. The county was not to blame, the third party was.