WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.180 --> 00:00:03.620
I owe President Donald J. Trump an apology.

2
00:00:07.420 --> 00:00:10.240
President Trump has been indicted by Fulton County.

3
00:00:11.060 --> 00:00:13.740
May I remind you that Fulton County has been

4
00:00:14.160 --> 00:00:15.420
found to be in violation

5
00:00:16.080 --> 00:00:17.340
of election law,

6
00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:20.460
not once for the hand audit, but twice

7
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:22.340
for the machine count.

8
00:00:22.960 --> 00:00:24.240
And now

9
00:00:24.600 --> 00:00:26.260
we can prove that they

10
00:00:29.380 --> 00:00:31.300
had intentional human intervention,

11
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:37.100
Which

12
00:00:38.060 --> 00:00:38.920
is the predicate

13
00:00:43.780 --> 00:00:44.580
for election fraud.

14
00:00:47.080 --> 00:00:49.580
You all know our cases SEB. 20 23

15
00:00:49.580 --> 00:00:50.680
thank you- 25.

16
00:00:51.680 --> 00:00:52.180
In

17
00:00:53.180 --> 00:00:58.780
that case you know that it involves 18800 and that it involved 17, 1852 votes counted without ballot images. You also know that for the 1st machine count,

18
00:00:59.420 --> 00:00:59.920
20, 713

19
00:01:03.040 --> 00:01:04.500
ballots were counted

20
00:01:05.420 --> 00:01:07.840
with what I like to call receipts.

21
00:01:08.500 --> 00:01:15.560
I guess the fancy word is tabulator tapes. And I always like to say you can't get out of Walmart these days without showing your receipt,

22
00:01:16.220 --> 00:01:20.120
but for some reason you can count 20, 000 votes without a receipt.

23
00:01:21.540 --> 00:01:24.140
The last part of this complaint

24
00:01:25.120 --> 00:01:26.720
perhaps is the most concerning

25
00:01:27.440 --> 00:01:30.300
because we've uncovered some recent information

26
00:01:30.940 --> 00:01:32.260
that makes it so.

27
00:01:34.260 --> 00:01:35.800
In addition to proving

28
00:01:36.540 --> 00:01:37.460
that 3930

29
00:01:39.160 --> 00:01:39.660
ballots

30
00:01:40.240 --> 00:01:41.060
were scanned

31
00:01:41.700 --> 00:01:42.200
and

32
00:01:42.860 --> 00:01:43.360
counted.

33
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:45.880
I want to say that again and

34
00:01:46.320 --> 00:01:46.820
counted

35
00:01:47.500 --> 00:01:50.120
And I sure hope that Miss Charlene McGowan

36
00:01:50.740 --> 00:01:51.480
is listening.

37
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:52.680
Miss McGowan,

38
00:01:53.500 --> 00:01:54.500
on May 7th,

39
00:01:54.920 --> 00:01:57.380
you and your team got up before the board

40
00:01:57.820 --> 00:02:00.600
and said, Yeah, I think Mr Rossi is right.

41
00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:02.000
These

42
00:02:02.360 --> 00:02:02.860
ballots

43
00:02:03.380 --> 00:02:04.600
were scanned twice,

44
00:02:05.700 --> 00:02:06.960
but we're not sure

45
00:02:07.740 --> 00:02:09.460
if they were counted twice.

46
00:02:10.660 --> 00:02:11.660
That is a lie.

47
00:02:12.440 --> 00:02:14.280
And we know that because

48
00:02:15.060 --> 00:02:17.460
The data that shows they're counted twice

49
00:02:18.440 --> 00:02:20.200
is on the cast vote records,

50
00:02:21.300 --> 00:02:21.800
and

51
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:25.240
that is available to the secretary of states.

52
00:02:26.260 --> 00:02:27.740
Other experts know

53
00:02:28.160 --> 00:02:29.240
that those ballots

54
00:02:29.640 --> 00:02:30.940
were counted twice.

55
00:02:32.780 --> 00:02:33.700
Media sources

56
00:02:34.400 --> 00:02:37.560
know I saw Mr Nisi from the AJC.

57
00:02:37.620 --> 00:02:39.980
Just walk up here and not to get him in trouble,

58
00:02:40.560 --> 00:02:42.100
but he recently reported

59
00:02:42.700 --> 00:02:45.200
he thinks they were counted twice also.

60
00:02:46.340 --> 00:02:47.560
And that's from the AJC.

61
00:02:51.180 --> 00:02:55.500
Sorry Mark, if I'm going too far just say stop Joe, you're going to get me in trouble.

62
00:02:56.060 --> 00:02:56.560
Okay,

63
00:02:56.980 --> 00:03:00.100
so they were counted twice for the 2nd machine count.

64
00:03:01.360 --> 00:03:02.640
We know with certainty

65
00:03:03.580 --> 00:03:04.580
that this

66
00:03:05.200 --> 00:03:05.700
duplication

67
00:03:06.760 --> 00:03:07.500
of ballots

68
00:03:08.140 --> 00:03:09.000
was not,

69
00:03:09.680 --> 00:03:10.620
I want to repeat,

70
00:03:10.960 --> 00:03:11.780
was not

71
00:03:12.760 --> 00:03:13.460
an administrative

72
00:03:14.560 --> 00:03:15.060
error.

73
00:03:15.480 --> 00:03:18.400
And I'm going to demonstrate to you how we know that shortly.

74
00:03:19.620 --> 00:03:20.740
Rather, the duplication

75
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:23.340
process

76
00:03:24.260 --> 00:03:25.060
was due

77
00:03:25.360 --> 00:03:26.100
to intentional

78
00:03:27.120 --> 00:03:27.620
human

79
00:03:28.220 --> 00:03:28.720
intervention.

80
00:03:31.020 --> 00:03:34.440
And I'm not a lawyer, but when I ran this by a few lawyers,

81
00:03:35.140 --> 00:03:37.200
they told me this is the phrase.

82
00:03:39.300 --> 00:03:40.240
Human intentional

83
00:03:40.840 --> 00:03:41.780
human intervention

84
00:03:43.060 --> 00:03:44.020
is the predicate

85
00:03:45.060 --> 00:03:45.800
for election,

86
00:03:46.640 --> 00:03:48.060
I'm going to use the F word,

87
00:03:48.460 --> 00:03:48.960
fraud.

88
00:03:52.060 --> 00:03:52.560
OK,

89
00:03:53.420 --> 00:03:56.340
you're going to hear me say that several times. At the heart of this presentation,

90
00:03:58.240 --> 00:04:00.640
I said that the ballots were tabulated

91
00:04:01.320 --> 00:04:02.980
twice, counted twice,

92
00:04:03.800 --> 00:04:05.840
and it was not done accidentally.

93
00:04:07.480 --> 00:04:09.560
This slide shows that a ballot

94
00:04:10.060 --> 00:04:11.400
on the right over here

95
00:04:12.440 --> 00:04:13.720
was scanned and counted,

96
00:04:14.380 --> 00:04:15.540
creates a file.

97
00:04:15.980 --> 00:04:24.780
Some of the experts in the room like Garland know this, but if it's scanned again, it creates another file, which means it has counted twice.

98
00:04:26.400 --> 00:04:26.900
So

99
00:04:27.200 --> 00:04:28.460
how did this happen?

100
00:04:33.660 --> 00:04:35.680
This is a very complicated slide

101
00:04:36.420 --> 00:04:38.900
that has taken months for technical experts

102
00:04:39.460 --> 00:04:44.000
to develop and explain. It's also very difficult to explain still.

103
00:04:44.740 --> 00:04:46.420
But it Basically shows that ballots

104
00:04:47.080 --> 00:04:47.860
were scanned

105
00:04:48.520 --> 00:04:49.540
on 1 day,

106
00:04:50.600 --> 00:04:51.260
and then

107
00:04:51.940 --> 00:04:55.460
they were randomly picked these batches of ballots

108
00:04:56.500 --> 00:04:58.040
and created new batches

109
00:04:58.860 --> 00:04:59.620
and scanned

110
00:05:00.660 --> 00:05:01.740
a 2nd day

111
00:05:02.060 --> 00:05:03.280
on a different tabulator.

112
00:05:04.060 --> 00:05:06.300
So you probably can't understand this slide.

113
00:05:06.600 --> 00:05:10.060
So I'm going to show you how it was done very crudely. Okay?

114
00:05:11.600 --> 00:05:12.260
All right.

115
00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:16.420
So on that 1st chair, you have a stack of ballots. You see them over there?

116
00:05:17.780 --> 00:05:19.400
Again, my props are not professional.

117
00:05:19.900 --> 00:05:22.760
I'm just doing what I can to get the message out.

118
00:05:23.400 --> 00:05:25.940
On the 2nd chair, you have a 2nd stack of ballots

119
00:05:26.400 --> 00:05:29.740
that were scanned, let's say December 2nd, Wednesday,

120
00:05:30.340 --> 00:05:31.160
when the midnight

121
00:05:31.660 --> 00:05:33.060
deadline was for

122
00:05:33.740 --> 00:05:39.200
doing the election recount. On the 3rd chair, you have 0.333 stack of ballots

123
00:05:39.840 --> 00:05:40.940
that were scanned

124
00:05:41.440 --> 00:05:42.140
on Wednesday.

125
00:05:43.440 --> 00:05:43.940
Now

126
00:05:44.280 --> 00:05:49.660
someone or some group, I don't know who, but this is not accidental what they did.

127
00:05:50.420 --> 00:05:51.140
They went

128
00:05:51.580 --> 00:05:53.020
to 1 stack of ballots,

129
00:05:53.860 --> 00:05:57.060
randomly grabbed a few stacks from that.

130
00:06:08.240 --> 00:06:14.780
No order, I got a random group, okay? Some of them I flipped around so that they count backwards this time.

131
00:06:15.180 --> 00:06:18.180
Then they went to another stack of ballots that were already scanned.

132
00:06:29.820 --> 00:06:34.220
You Notice I'm not necessarily picking them from the top, right? I'm just grabbing randomly.

133
00:06:34.530 --> 00:06:35.030
And

134
00:06:35.340 --> 00:06:38.320
1 more time, I'll do it for example, they went to another stack.

135
00:06:48.500 --> 00:06:49.220
And then

136
00:06:50.740 --> 00:06:52.600
the next day they came back

137
00:06:53.940 --> 00:06:56.180
with that randomly selected stack

138
00:06:56.540 --> 00:06:57.680
and guess what they

139
00:07:03.820 --> 00:07:04.320
did?

140
00:07:06.580 --> 00:07:08.540
That last chair over there is a tabulator.

141
00:07:09.280 --> 00:07:10.300
They ran them through

142
00:07:11.160 --> 00:07:13.740
on a 2nd day through a different tabulator

143
00:07:14.380 --> 00:07:15.480
and they did that

144
00:07:15.860 --> 00:07:16.820
for 3930

145
00:07:17.640 --> 00:07:18.140
ballots.

146
00:07:18.780 --> 00:07:21.640
Who in the room thinks that's accidental? Raise your hand.

147
00:07:24.740 --> 00:07:25.860
I don't think so.

148
00:07:30.660 --> 00:07:32.020
All right, I'm going to close

149
00:07:32.700 --> 00:07:34.240
with how I started this

150
00:07:35.160 --> 00:07:36.280
little talk here.

151
00:07:36.700 --> 00:07:38.960
I'm going to read it 1 more time if you don't mind.

152
00:07:39.880 --> 00:07:40.500
It says,

153
00:07:41.220 --> 00:07:42.540
in addition to proving

154
00:07:43.520 --> 00:07:44.340
that 3, 930

155
00:07:45.300 --> 00:07:51.400
ballots were scanned and counted 2 times for the 2nd machine count, which was the certified count.

156
00:07:51.940 --> 00:07:52.440
We

157
00:07:52.980 --> 00:07:54.240
now know with certainty

158
00:07:54.660 --> 00:07:59.000
that this duplication of ballots was not a mere administrative error.

159
00:08:00.520 --> 00:08:01.580
Rather, the duplication

160
00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:02.420
process

161
00:08:03.080 --> 00:08:04.220
was due to

162
00:08:04.840 --> 00:08:05.340
intentional

163
00:08:06.760 --> 00:08:07.260
human

164
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:08.420
intervention.

165
00:08:09.400 --> 00:08:11.960
And I said, the lawyers tell me that,

166
00:08:12.540 --> 00:08:14.400
that is the predicate for

167
00:08:15.260 --> 00:08:15.760
election

168
00:08:17.100 --> 00:08:18.020
fraud. And now,

169
00:08:18.520 --> 00:08:19.320
in closing,

170
00:08:19.900 --> 00:08:22.120
I remind you about Mr. Raffensperger's

171
00:08:22.480 --> 00:08:24.140
ex post of August 1st.

172
00:08:24.580 --> 00:08:25.800
If you have the data,

173
00:08:26.140 --> 00:08:27.180
bring it to them.

174
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:33.060
Mr. Secretary, we're bringing the data to you and we are counting on you to do the right thing

175
00:08:33.380 --> 00:08:34.520
and investigate

176
00:08:35.060 --> 00:08:35.560
independently.

177
00:08:36.100 --> 00:08:37.520
Independently is critical.

178
00:08:38.100 --> 00:08:39.360
SEB 2023-25.

179
00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:42.340
Thank you.